Changes

Stephdl - have looked through this and suggested a couple of minor chanegs etc, if you are happy with this I will merge it with the manual over next few days..(TF)

Stephdl - have looked through this and suggested a couple of minor chanegs etc, if you are happy with this I will merge it with the manual over next few days..[[User:Trex|Trex]] ([[User talk:Trex|talk]])

there's a incomplete/wrong info in the sentence

there's a incomplete/wrong info in the sentence

"*  Installation on a system with 1 hard drive is automatically set up as a RAID1 ready to accept further drives if or when they are installed.  Systems with 2 drives are set up as RAID 1; Systems with 3 drives are set up as RAID 1 + Hot-spare, 4-6 drives as RAID5 + 1 Hot-spare, and 7+ Drives as RAID6 + Hot-spare. [[Raid|Raid How To]] "

"*  Installation on a system with 1 hard drive is automatically set up as a RAID1 ready to accept further drives if or when they are installed.  Systems with 2 drives are set up as RAID 1; Systems with 3 drives are set up as RAID 1 + Hot-spare, 4-6 drives as RAID5 + 1 Hot-spare, and 7+ Drives as RAID6 + Hot-spare. [[Raid|Raid How To]] "

Correceted the grammer so it reads better (TF)

Correceted the grammer so it reads better [[User:Trex|Trex]] ([[User talk:Trex|talk]])

because with 3 drives, natively, SME will setup a Raid 1 + spare array (cfr http://wiki.contribs.org/Raid)

because with 3 drives, natively, SME will setup a Raid 1 + spare array (cfr http://wiki.contribs.org/Raid)

should it be corrected? shouldn't a link to Raid page be better?

should it be corrected? shouldn't a link to Raid page be better?

Agree a link to the Raid page would be far better, just need to redo the entry and add the link http://wiki.contribs.org/Raid this page alos needs updateing re release etc  - TerryF

Agree a link to the Raid page would be far better, just need to redo the entry and add the link http://wiki.contribs.org/Raid this page alos needs updateing re release etc  - [[User:Trex|Trex]] ([[User talk:Trex|talk]])

  This my proposition/draft to rewrite the chapter 1 from stephane de Labrusse

  This my proposition/draft to rewrite the chapter 1 from stephane de Labrusse

Will finish proofing and amalgamate your edits etc to the Chapter..thanks - TerryF

Will finish proofing and amalgamate your edits etc to the Chapter..thanks - [[User:Trex|Trex]] ([[User talk:Trex|talk]])

need your help, a pick up few lines below in the text...that i think we need to discuss [[User:Stephdl|Stephdl]] ([[User talk:Stephdl|talk]])

need your help, a pick up few lines below in the text...that i think we need to discuss [[User:Stephdl|Stephdl]] ([[User talk:Stephdl|talk]])

*'''(i need your advice - Changed a couple of words which makes it read better, the statement should still be included IMO, MITEL still offers a commercial solution (TF))''' The heart of SME Server is based on the GPL'd sources of the unsupported developer release of SME 7.0 alpha from [http://www.mitel.com/ Mitel], who are the copyright holder for much of what makes SME Server what it is.  Mitel's commercial offering is known as the  "Mitel Managed Application Server", and in the past was known as e-Smith.  Mitel has been very generous to fund development of the alpha and beta versions and to keep to the  spirit of the GPL by sharing their source code freely.

*'''(i need your advice - Changed a couple of words which makes it read better, the statement should still be included IMO, MITEL still offers a commercial solution (TF))''' The heart of SME Server is based on the GPL'd sources of the unsupported developer release of SME 7.0 alpha from [http://www.mitel.com/ Mitel], who are the copyright holder for much of what makes SME Server what it is.  Mitel's commercial offering is known as the  "Mitel Managed Application Server", and in the past was known as e-Smith.  Mitel has been very generous to fund development of the alpha and beta versions and to keep to the  spirit of the GPL by sharing their source code freely.

*(your advice, reads OK, or is technical facts doudtful (TF)) Windows 2000, XP and W7 domain logon support - Previous versions have allowed the server to act as a domain controller for client computers running Windows 95, 98, ME or NT. This version now extends that domain logon support to Windows 2000, XP and W7.  

*(your advice, reads OK, or is technical facts doudtful [[User:Trex|Trex]] ([[User talk:Trex|talk]])) Windows 2000, XP and W7 domain logon support - Previous versions have allowed the server to act as a domain controller for client computers running Windows 95, 98, ME or NT. This version now extends that domain logon support to Windows 2000, XP and W7.  

*(Is it always right, AFAIK, will need to ask in devs list or bug tracker to confirm (TF)) Experimental ISDN card support - While our software has always supported external ISDN adapters, this version now includes experimental support for using an internal passive ISDN card.  

*(Is it always right, AFAIK, will need to ask in devs list or bug tracker to confirm [[User:Trex|Trex]] ([[User talk:Trex|talk]]) ) Experimental ISDN card support - While our software has always supported external ISDN adapters, this version now includes experimental support for using an internal passive ISDN card.  

*(need to be reread, reads OK to me (TF)) Use of unmodified packages from upstream providers - Packages from Centos 5 (2.6.18 kernel), Mitel, and other packages from atrpms and rpmforge are used unmodified whenever possible. The result is that any other Redhat EL5 or Centos 5 RPMS should work without modification.  

*(need to be reread, reads OK to me [[User:Trex|Trex]] ([[User talk:Trex|talk]]) ) Use of unmodified packages from upstream providers - Packages from Centos 5 (2.6.18 kernel), Mitel, and other packages from atrpms and rpmforge are used unmodified whenever possible. The result is that any other Redhat EL5 or Centos 5 RPMS should work without modification.