334
edits
Changes
From SME Server
Jump to navigationJump to search→Nice to have
== Nice to have ==
== Nice to have ==
{{Note box| SME 9.0 is just moving SME 8.0 onto a CentOS 6 base. No new features are planned.<br>
{{Note box| SME Server 9.0 is just moving SME Server 8.0 onto a CentOS 6 base. No new features are planned.<br>
SME 9.1 will be open for new features that have a credible development plan.<br>For now the current events and efforts are geared towards a transition from SME8 to SME9 'as is'}}
SME Server 9.1 will be open for new features that have a credible development plan.<br>For now the current events and efforts are geared towards a transition from SME Server 8 to SME Server 9 'as is'}}
* SME Server 9.0 is in final productisation, bugfixes and translations only.
* Move server manager to Mojolicious
{{Note box| SME Server 9.1<br>This is likely to be based on CentOS 6.6 maybe during summer 2014}}
** From Charie on Devinfo
** Please everybody, go and have a look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mojolicious Mojolicious]. It's what I strongly recommend for new UI developments. Very, very well maintained and tested.
* Webmail
** Webmail is Core
** For SME Server 9.1 Horde 5.x is the default for core. See [[bugzilla:6653|Bug 6653]]
* Partial Samba 4 support
** What can be achieved in the next 3 months?
** See See [[bugzilla:8075|Bug 8075]]
* Minor improvements to Backup - Restore (Ian)
** My improvements to Backup Restore did not make the 9.0 development freeze.
{{Note box| SME Server 10.0<br>This is likely to be based on CentOS 7.0}}
* Full Samba 4 support(David Harper)
** Investigate the implications for the SME ecosystem of moving to Samba 4 (e.g. currently UNIX accounts are used for authentication but for Samba 4 all auth would have to be done through Active Directory - e.g. IMAP, webmail, VPN etc.)
** Would likely require BIND 9 instead of dnsmasq
* Webmail (Ian)
* Webmail
** Decide if webmail is Core or Contrib - I vote for Core (mrjhb3) - If you don't want these comments here, then please delete.
** Choose the webmail solution that will be in the core for SME Server 10. Alternatives will be contribs.
*** Zarafa oh yé [[User:Stephdl|Stephdl]] ([[User talk:Stephdl|talk]])
*** Zarafa oh yé [[User:Stephdl|Stephdl]] ([[User talk:Stephdl|talk]])
*** Horde 5.x - would make the most sense as a direct upgrade to 8.x and has free sync to Outlook via Funambol (David Harper) I have this working, so after 9 is released, the community can decide if we stay on this path for 9.x. (mrjhb3)
*** Horde 5.x - has free sync to Outlook via Funambol (David Harper) I have this working (mrjhb3)
*** eGroupware It will be my choice --[[User:Larieu|Larieu]] ([[User talk:Larieu|talk]]) 03:35, 6 February 2013 (MST) - I think this is a good starting point to compare [http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reviews/7289/1 compare]
*** eGroupware It will be my choice --[[User:Larieu|Larieu]] ([[User talk:Larieu|talk]]) 03:35, 6 February 2013 (MST) - I think this is a good starting point to compare [http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reviews/7289/1 compare]
* Move server manager to Mojolicious
** Background reading [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mojolicious Mojolicious].
** See [[bugzilla:7819|Bug 7819]]
{{Note box| unclassified list below }}
* IPV6 (Ian)
* IPV6 (Ian)
** support IPv6. See [[bugzilla:6393|Bug 6393]]
** support IPv6. See [[bugzilla:6393|Bug 6393]]
