Line 8: |
Line 8: |
| | | |
| == Nice to have == | | == Nice to have == |
− | {{Note box| SME 9.0 is just moving SME 8.0 onto a CentOS 6 base. No new features are planned.<br> | + | {{Note box| SME Server 9.0 is just moving SME Server 8.0 onto a CentOS 6 base. No new features are planned.<br> |
− | SME 9.1 will be open for new features that have a credible development plan.<br>For now the current events and efforts are geared towards a transition from SME8 to SME9 'as is'}} | + | SME Server 9.1 will be open for new features that have a credible development plan.<br>For now the current events and efforts are geared towards a transition from SME Server 8 to SME Server 9 'as is'}} |
| | | |
| + | * SME Server 9.0 is in final productisation, bugfixes and translations only. |
| | | |
− | * Move server manager to Mojolicious | + | {{Note box| SME Server 9.1<br>This is likely to be based on CentOS 6.6 maybe during summer 2014}} |
− | ** From Charie on Devinfo | + | |
− | ** Please everybody, go and have a look at [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mojolicious Mojolicious]. It's what I strongly recommend for new UI developments. Very, very well maintained and tested. | + | * Webmail |
| + | ** Webmail is Core |
| + | ** For SME Server 9.1 Horde 5.x is the default for core. See [[bugzilla:6653|Bug 6653]] |
| + | |
| + | * Partial Samba 4 support |
| + | ** What can be achieved in the next 3 months? |
| + | ** See See [[bugzilla:8075|Bug 8075]] |
| + | |
| + | * Minor improvements to Backup - Restore (Ian) |
| + | ** My improvements to Backup Restore did not make the 9.0 development freeze. |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | {{Note box| SME Server 10.0<br>This is likely to be based on CentOS 7.0}} |
| | | |
| + | * Full Samba 4 support(David Harper) |
| + | ** Investigate the implications for the SME ecosystem of moving to Samba 4 (e.g. currently UNIX accounts are used for authentication but for Samba 4 all auth would have to be done through Active Directory - e.g. IMAP, webmail, VPN etc.) |
| + | ** Would likely require BIND 9 instead of dnsmasq |
| | | |
− | * Webmail (Ian) | + | * Webmail |
− | ** Decide if webmail is Core or Contrib - I vote for Core (mrjhb3) - If you don't want these comments here, then please delete. | + | ** Choose the webmail solution that will be in the core for SME Server 10. Alternatives will be contribs. |
− | ** Investigate the webmail solutions available, and features such as activesync (Horde 5.1 is supposed to support MS EAS 14.1, 5.2 adds some additional features - mrjhb3)
| |
− | ** Decide which webmail should be in core, if any
| |
| *** Zarafa oh yé [[User:Stephdl|Stephdl]] ([[User talk:Stephdl|talk]]) | | *** Zarafa oh yé [[User:Stephdl|Stephdl]] ([[User talk:Stephdl|talk]]) |
− | *** Horde 5.x - would make the most sense as a direct upgrade to 8.x and has free sync to Outlook via Funambol (David Harper) I have this working, so after 9 is released, the community can decide if we stay on this path for 9.x. (mrjhb3) | + | *** Horde 5.x - has free sync to Outlook via Funambol (David Harper) I have this working (mrjhb3) |
| *** eGroupware It will be my choice --[[User:Larieu|Larieu]] ([[User talk:Larieu|talk]]) 03:35, 6 February 2013 (MST) - I think this is a good starting point to compare [http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reviews/7289/1 compare] | | *** eGroupware It will be my choice --[[User:Larieu|Larieu]] ([[User talk:Larieu|talk]]) 03:35, 6 February 2013 (MST) - I think this is a good starting point to compare [http://www.linuxplanet.com/linuxplanet/reviews/7289/1 compare] |
| | | |
| | | |
| + | * Move server manager to Mojolicious |
| + | ** Background reading [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mojolicious Mojolicious]. |
| + | ** See [[bugzilla:7819|Bug 7819]] |
| + | |
| + | |
| + | {{Note box| unclassified list below }} |
| | | |
| * IPV6 (Ian) | | * IPV6 (Ian) |
| ** support IPv6. See [[bugzilla:6393|Bug 6393]] | | ** support IPv6. See [[bugzilla:6393|Bug 6393]] |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− |
| |
− | * Samba 4 (David Harper)
| |
− | ** Decide whether Samba 4 is going to be production ready for the SME 9 dev cycle
| |
− | ** Investigate the implications for the SME ecosystem of moving to Samba 4 (e.g. currently UNIX accounts are used for authentication but for Samba 4 all auth would have to be done through Active Directory - e.g. IMAP, webmail, VPN etc.)
| |
− | ** Would likely require BIND 9 instead of dnsmasq
| |
| | | |
| | | |