2,569
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 117:
Line 117: − A=`cat $1 |grep entry |wc -l` − C=`expr $A / 2` + Line 142:
Line 141: − + − + − + − − : On top off that I would retrieve the numeric value for C like this, which saves you some mathematics − : <pre>C=`cat $1 |grep '<entry>' |wc -l`</pre> − − : [[User:Cactus|Cactus]] 15:12, 3 February 2008 (MST)
→newpo: thanks, maths tip used, was trying to escape instead of quote
mv $1.bak $1
mv $1.bak $1
B=`cat $1.po |grep msgid |wc -l`
B=`cat $1.po |grep msgid |wc -l`
C=`cat $1 |grep '<entry>' |wc -l`
D=`expr $B - 1`
D=`expr $B - 1`
E=`expr $B - $C`
E=`expr $B - $C`
:I am wondering why we are using perl to replace as we can also use sed and if readability is not an issue we can do the whole CDATA tag conversin at once
:I am wondering why we are using perl to replace as we can also use sed and if readability is not an issue we can do the whole CDATA tag conversin at once
: <pre>sed -e 's/<!\[CDATA\[/STARTCDATA/g' -e 's/\]\]>/ENDCDATA/g' -e 's/\]\]>/ENDCDATA/g' -e 's/\]\]>/ENDCDATA/g' -e 's/\]\]>/ENDCDATA/g' < /path/to/orignal.file > /path/to/conversion.file</pre>
: <pre>sed -e 's/<!\[CDATA\[/STARTCDATA/g' -e 's/\]\]>/ENDCDATA/g' -e 's/\&>/AMP/g' < original.file > conversion.file</pre>
: And back
: And back
: <pre>sed -e 's/STARTCDATA/<!\[CDATA\[/g' -e 's/ENDCDATA/\]\]>/g' -e 's/AMP/\&/g' < conversion.file > new.file</pre>
: <pre>sed -e 's/STARTCDATA/<!\[CDATA\[/g' -e 's/ENDCDATA/\]\]>/g' -e 's/AMP/\&/g' < /path/to/conversion.file > /path/to/new.file</pre>
::yes but there are more conversions, so it was easier to operate on the one file, efficiency isn't a concern
====newpomerge====
====newpomerge====