Line 10: |
Line 10: |
| * a plugin, method, or option that blocks the update of packages from 3rd party repos if the new version requires a package that is included with SME / Centos that has not yet been updated. | | * a plugin, method, or option that blocks the update of packages from 3rd party repos if the new version requires a package that is included with SME / Centos that has not yet been updated. |
| * a way to notify users of the blocked updates so they can decide if the blocked update involves a security issue | | * a way to notify users of the blocked updates so they can decide if the blocked update involves a security issue |
− | * '''or''' documentation on how to work around this issue, along the lines of "observe the problem, identify the blocking package, update the blocking package independantly using the "--noplugins" option, then finish your update | + | * '''or''' documentation on how to work around this issue, along the lines of "observe the problem, identify the blocking package, update the blocking package independently using the "--noplugins" option, then finish your update |
| + | |
| + | :sn |
| + | :yes this is a big problem |
| + | :want to search or ask at the yum mailinglist, this should be a known problem |
| | | |
| ===Side note on security=== | | ===Side note on security=== |
Line 16: |
Line 20: |
| | | |
| Is there any easy way to scan a SME server, identify any installed packages that are not considered secure by the SME developers, then modify /etc/motd and add a note to server-manager stating that "unevaluated packages are installed"? | | Is there any easy way to scan a SME server, identify any installed packages that are not considered secure by the SME developers, then modify /etc/motd and add a note to server-manager stating that "unevaluated packages are installed"? |
| + | |
| :Perhaps you can use the following audittool in your detection logic as it should report all contribs from 3d party repositories: | | :Perhaps you can use the following audittool in your detection logic as it should report all contribs from 3d party repositories: |
| | | |
Line 28: |
Line 33: |
| | | |
| only difference is there will be a different fragment to modify /etc/yum.conf/something | | only difference is there will be a different fragment to modify /etc/yum.conf/something |
− |
| |
− | ----
| |
− |
| |
− | perl-DBIx-DBSchema is not installed by default, I don't have either of the below rpms installed
| |
− |
| |
− | I tried to install with priority=10 and couldn't, same error as you
| |
− |
| |
− | with priority=99 it would install
| |
− | yum install --enablerepo=dag perl-DBIx-DBSchema
| |
− |
| |
− | =============================================================================
| |
− | Package Arch Version Repository Size
| |
− | =============================================================================
| |
− | Installing:
| |
− | perl-DBIx-DBSchema noarch 0.36-1.el4.rf dag 70 k
| |
− | Installing for dependencies:
| |
− | perl-DBD-Pg i386 2.11.1-1.el4.rf dag 286 k
| |