Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jester"

From SME Server
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 4: Line 4:
 
----
 
----
  
I do think that Info has a different meaning opposed to Note and Tip, so yes! But that's apparently my opinion. If you do not want people to add more of those template then i suggest you lock it down. Was that BTW then ground to just revert all the changes ?! Changing the 'dreaded' Info box to one YOU find more appropriate was not easy enough?! Fuck it then.... Thanx!
+
:I do think that Info has a different meaning opposed to Note and Tip, so yes! But that's apparently my opinion. If you do not want people to add more of those template then i suggest you lock it down. Was that BTW then ground to just revert all the changes ?! Changing the 'dreaded' Info box to one YOU find more appropriate was not easy enough?! Fuck it then.... Thanx!
  
--[[User:Jester|jester]] 13:52, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
+
:--[[User:Jester|jester]] 13:52, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
::Yes, I see no need for more boxes and would appreciate discussion on this first before setting off in creating other boxes. You seem to be the first to disagree and in need for (yet) another box.
 +
::Next time please mind you language, there is no need for such strong words. <small>—&nbsp;[[User:Cactus|Cactus]] ([[User talk:Cactus|talk]]&nbsp;|&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Cactus|contribs]])&nbsp;</small> 14:25, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:25, 31 July 2009

re Template:InfoBox

Did you really need to create a new template for this? We already have the Note and Tip variant. I seriously doubt the content of your box does not fit in there. — Cactus (talk | contribs 18:34, 29 July 2009 (UTC)


I do think that Info has a different meaning opposed to Note and Tip, so yes! But that's apparently my opinion. If you do not want people to add more of those template then i suggest you lock it down. Was that BTW then ground to just revert all the changes ?! Changing the 'dreaded' Info box to one YOU find more appropriate was not easy enough?! Fuck it then.... Thanx!
--jester 13:52, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Yes, I see no need for more boxes and would appreciate discussion on this first before setting off in creating other boxes. You seem to be the first to disagree and in need for (yet) another box.
Next time please mind you language, there is no need for such strong words. — Cactus (talk | contribs 14:25, 31 July 2009 (UTC)