Changes

Jump to navigation Jump to search
no edit summary
Line 115: Line 115:  
----
 
----
   −
I can add a test in the RPM install as described in the doc.
+
I can add a test in the RPM install as described in the doc. But we should raise a bug I think.
But we should raise a bug I think.
+
 
 +
 
 +
I will also add dependency perl-XML-SAX to the list.
 +
 
 +
This code should do the job in the RPM install:
 +
if [ ! -e  /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/XML/SAX/ParserDetails.ini ]; then
 +
  touch    /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/XML/SAX/ParserDetails.ini
 +
  chmod 444 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/XML/SAX/ParserDetails.ini
 +
  perl -MXML::SAX -e "XML::SAX->add_parser(q(XML::SAX::PurePerl))->save_parsers()"
 +
fi
 +
This is enough for our needs right now but if it's a bug, we should raise it. As this test check if the file exists, it will never overwrite so after an hypotetical update of the upstream package the test is still safe to use...
 +
 
 +
 
 +
The good question is where should we raise this bug! SME bugtracker??
 +
 
 +
My understanding of the doc is ''yes'', maybe ask for a NFR smeserver-perl-xml-sax-x.x-x or fix the existing SRPM in smeupdates?
 +
 
 +
Or rebuild the original package? I think no, because the doc says that the RPM should be adapted for other RPM based distros... But I'm no expert!
 +
 
 +
What do you think? You're the pro! ;-)
       
Cool34000
 
Cool34000
 
----
 
----
498

edits

Navigation menu