147
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 3:
Line 3: − ===User experience===+ + Line 27:
Line 28: + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Credits
You (christian) have this:
You (christian) have this:
'''User experience'''
* Tested with SME Server 7.3 and X10's CM11a - Works
* Tested with SME Server 7.3 and X10's CM11a - Works
at the bottom of the page. Is this based on your single experience or is that a reason for removing the needs review template? --[[User:Ente|Ente]] 17:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
at the bottom of the page. Is this based on your single experience or is that a reason for removing the needs review template? --[[User:Ente|Ente]] 17:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
BTW, thank you for taking the time to review and comment!
BTW, thank you for taking the time to review and comment!
--[[User:Christian|Christian]] 17:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
--[[User:Christian|Christian]] 17:53, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
:All right you're welcome --[[User:Ente|Ente]] 17:58, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
I noticed cactus added a suggestion in the User Experience section about signing the experience. Good idea and I have also added this to the other entries I have with this as well although there dates may be off now.--[[User:Christian|Christian]] 20:56, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
== Credits ==
Cactus notes that credits should not be in the wiki as it can be viewed in the history.
My concern is not about credits but about originators and maintainers. While it is true for "heyu" that history will tell you who did what it would not be true for example with "squeezecenter" or "mythtv". In "squeezecenter" Williamsyd did the hard work, I just documented, tested, and refined but you would not know that from the wiki entry without the credits.
I'm not strongly opinionated on this but it is why I added it.
--[[User:Christian|Christian]] 17:21, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
----