Changes

at the bottom of the page. Is this based on your single experience or is that a reason for removing the needs review template? --[[User:Ente|Ente]] 17:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

at the bottom of the page. Is this based on your single experience or is that a reason for removing the needs review template? --[[User:Ente|Ente]] 17:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)

It is based on my own set up, I usually add this section to have people indicate actual success data points. I did this in the Myth set up as well.

:It is based on my own set up, I usually add this section to have people indicate actual success data points. I did this in the Myth set up as well.

It does work fine and reliably. In general if I come across issues in future, I update the wiki.

:It does work fine and reliably. In general if I come across issues in future, I update the wiki.

I take your point about gcc, but it is also used in other How-to's such as "vmware". I'm open to suggestions on this front.  

:I take your point about gcc, but it is also used in other How-to's such as "vmware". I'm open to suggestions on this front.  

I would have thought that the "needs review" template would require someone to review the content for potential technical issues or bad practice; which is a good thing to do.

:I would have thought that the "needs review" template would require someone to review the content for potential technical issues or bad practice; which is a good thing to do.

BTW, how do you automatically add the signature/date tage such as you did on your comment?

:BTW, how do you automatically add the signature/date tage such as you did on your comment?