157
edits
Changes
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 32:
Line 32: + + +
User talk:Electroman00 (view source)
Revision as of 10:57, 20 December 2008
, 10:57, 20 December 2008no edit summary
:No, any time you see an inappropriate sig nature you may remove it, but I prefer that you do so after making a remark on the discussion tab, since, and I do not mean to brag, you do not have the level of authority that I have in this wiki. <small>— [[User:Cactus|Cactus]] ([[User talk:Cactus|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Cactus|contribs]]) </small> 09:10, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
:No, any time you see an inappropriate sig nature you may remove it, but I prefer that you do so after making a remark on the discussion tab, since, and I do not mean to brag, you do not have the level of authority that I have in this wiki. <small>— [[User:Cactus|Cactus]] ([[User talk:Cactus|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Cactus|contribs]]) </small> 09:10, 20 December 2008 (UTC)
'''10-4'''
'''10-4'''
Question for ya, see this page [[B2evolution]] under maintainer there's an email link, is that ok?
Also the reason why I re added the sig was because I thought it was just the way I did it the first time that didn't sit well, the second time was the way I found it on another page, I'm looking for that page to show you also. I do agree with you though, the sig really isn't needed due to the history page.