Difference between revisions of "SME Server talk:Documentation:Administration Manual:Chapter7"

From SME Server
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 2: Line 2:
  
 
[[User:Trex|Trex]] ([[User talk:Trex|talk]]) 14:28, 10 February 2013 (MST) Change refs to Windows 95 and 98 to XP, Vista and Windows 7, will require a rework of procedures to match thos OS's - Is it warranted to do this, or just remove refs to 95 and 98 and the specifics of the OS.?
 
[[User:Trex|Trex]] ([[User talk:Trex|talk]]) 14:28, 10 February 2013 (MST) Change refs to Windows 95 and 98 to XP, Vista and Windows 7, will require a rework of procedures to match thos OS's - Is it warranted to do this, or just remove refs to 95 and 98 and the specifics of the OS.?
 +
 +
[[User:Olddog11|relayer]] ([[User talk:Olddog11|talk]]) 14:36, 11 February 2013 (MST) I think it is a good idea so as not to make the documentation look outdated, we should be promoting the software as modern and current. Probably no need to include XP, Vista and Windows 7, if let's go for Windows 7 only.

Revision as of 22:36, 11 February 2013

Trex (talk) 13:32, 10 February 2013 (MST) Checked for errors, edits completed.

Trex (talk) 14:28, 10 February 2013 (MST) Change refs to Windows 95 and 98 to XP, Vista and Windows 7, will require a rework of procedures to match thos OS's - Is it warranted to do this, or just remove refs to 95 and 98 and the specifics of the OS.?

relayer (talk) 14:36, 11 February 2013 (MST) I think it is a good idea so as not to make the documentation look outdated, we should be promoting the software as modern and current. Probably no need to include XP, Vista and Windows 7, if let's go for Windows 7 only.