Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Yum Repository"
From SME Server
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (→RPMForge page removed for now: new section) |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
--[[User:Markleman|Markleman]] 23:48, 14 January 2010 (UTC) | --[[User:Markleman|Markleman]] 23:48, 14 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == RPMForge page removed for now == | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Next time first ask before adding it. The way you added it it might have caused serious issues as RPMForge distributes pacakges that might be newer than on SME Server, therefore you need to exclude a lot of packages as otherwise undesired updates of SME Server packages could have lead to issues which the small development team can not resolve. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :Besides that we already list the [[Dries]] and the [[Dag]] repositories, which together form RPMForge. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :For now I have removed RPMForge as I see no need for it ATM. Please be a little more carefull next time and raise your questions before taking action certainly when risks like this are involved. Thank in advance. <small>— [[User:Cactus|Cactus]] ([[User talk:Cactus|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Cactus|contribs]]) </small> 17:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 18:24, 15 January 2010
Should we add rpmforge, SME pulls rpms from it automatically already as part of updates and the buildsys
do we suggest using the rpm (below) or with the db as per the other repos
https://rpmrepo.org/RPMforge/Using
Added rpmforge in db format, please check.
--Markleman 23:48, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
RPMForge page removed for now
- Next time first ask before adding it. The way you added it it might have caused serious issues as RPMForge distributes pacakges that might be newer than on SME Server, therefore you need to exclude a lot of packages as otherwise undesired updates of SME Server packages could have lead to issues which the small development team can not resolve.
