Difference between revisions of "Talk:PHP5"
From SME Server
Jump to navigationJump to search (added response to Cactus) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
And why not use the PHP5 RPM's from CentosPlus like described by Greg Zartman in the forums: http://forums.contribs.org/index.php/topic,43086.msg204539.html#msg204539? Seems a lot easier and more stable to me. <small>— [[User:Cactus|Cactus]] ([[User talk:Cactus|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Cactus|contribs]]) </small> 19:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | And why not use the PHP5 RPM's from CentosPlus like described by Greg Zartman in the forums: http://forums.contribs.org/index.php/topic,43086.msg204539.html#msg204539? Seems a lot easier and more stable to me. <small>— [[User:Cactus|Cactus]] ([[User talk:Cactus|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Cactus|contribs]]) </small> 19:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | I didn't invent this method, just updated the Firewall Services contrib. Upgrading en masse to PHP5 makes it difficult to install other SME updates that depend on PHP. This contrib is standalone and therefore doesn't have that issue. In the end, it's just an option, nothing more. | + | I didn't invent this method, just updated the Firewall Services contrib. Upgrading en masse to PHP5 makes it difficult to install other SME updates that depend on PHP. This contrib is standalone and therefore doesn't have that issue. In the end, it's just an option, nothing more. <small>— [[User:davidiwharper|davidiwharper]]</small> 12:08, 1 February 2009 (AEDT) |
Revision as of 02:09, 2 February 2009
And why not use the PHP5 RPM's from CentosPlus like described by Greg Zartman in the forums: http://forums.contribs.org/index.php/topic,43086.msg204539.html#msg204539? Seems a lot easier and more stable to me. — Cactus (talk | contribs) 19:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
I didn't invent this method, just updated the Firewall Services contrib. Upgrading en masse to PHP5 makes it difficult to install other SME updates that depend on PHP. This contrib is standalone and therefore doesn't have that issue. In the end, it's just an option, nothing more. — davidiwharper 12:08, 1 February 2009 (AEDT)
