Difference between revisions of "Simple Package Modification"
From SME Server
Jump to navigationJump to search (New page: In Modify a Package cvs commit :q enter [is this right ?? messy] can be replaced by cvs -m '<comment>' commit and you won't be prompted for the comment....) |
m (My 2ct's on the new build architecture) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
cvs -m '<comment>' commit | cvs -m '<comment>' commit | ||
and you won't be prompted for the comment.... | and you won't be prompted for the comment.... | ||
| + | |||
| + | == My 2ct's on the new build architecture == | ||
| + | |||
| + | # Is it normal behavior for 'make clean' to not remove the noarch folder and RPMS in there as it does remove the SRPM? | ||
| + | # Is it normal for make to create a SRPM in the root of the branch (package-name/contribs7/) and the noarch RPM in a noarch folder? Shouldn't it be desired to build the SPRM in a seperate folder as well? | ||
| + | |||
| + | Now off to learn cvs (as mezzanine was a very nice shell hiding my lack of cvs knowledge) - [[User:Cactus|Cactus]] 05:07, 25 December 2007 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 13:07, 25 December 2007
In Modify a Package cvs commit
- q enter [is this right ?? messy]
can be replaced by cvs -m '<comment>' commit and you won't be prompted for the comment....
My 2ct's on the new build architecture
- Is it normal behavior for 'make clean' to not remove the noarch folder and RPMS in there as it does remove the SRPM?
- Is it normal for make to create a SRPM in the root of the branch (package-name/contribs7/) and the noarch RPM in a noarch folder? Shouldn't it be desired to build the SPRM in a seperate folder as well?
Now off to learn cvs (as mezzanine was a very nice shell hiding my lack of cvs knowledge) - Cactus 05:07, 25 December 2007 (MST)
