Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Yum Repository"
m (Extended header) |
m (Added signature) |
||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
I have added a short description to the repository configuration information, perhaps I will extend it a little more. But I don't think that we should unprotect the repository configuration information:<br/> | I have added a short description to the repository configuration information, perhaps I will extend it a little more. But I don't think that we should unprotect the repository configuration information:<br/> | ||
1. Not everybody needs to change this information, it is pretty critical information and everyone having a go at it could result in non-responsive systems or other strange errors we don't want the user community to suffer of.<br/> | 1. Not everybody needs to change this information, it is pretty critical information and everyone having a go at it could result in non-responsive systems or other strange errors we don't want the user community to suffer of.<br/> | ||
| − | 2. The use of the pages with configuration information is templated by means of the [[Template:Repository]] so we do not need to look through all of the wiki pages and all configuration changes are changed at once, as well as a little (standard) information that is displayed when inserting the repository configuration anywhere in the Wiki. | + | 2. The use of the pages with configuration information is templated by means of the [[Template:Repository]] so we do not need to look through all of the wiki pages and all configuration changes are changed at once, as well as a little (standard) information that is displayed when inserting the repository configuration anywhere in the Wiki. - [[User:Cactus|Cactus]] 12:34, 10 July 2007 (EDT) |
Revision as of 17:34, 10 July 2007
the exclude line needs work if it is a long line. there are not allowed to be any spaces. if there is one you get an error if there are an even number. you get rubbish in the db
Snoble 04:43, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
You are right, but I don't see any errors in the repositories in the Wiki at the moment. - Cactus 04:49, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
---
check dries history, now fixed Snoble 05:02, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
can we rename reponame to reponame_repo, or similar
reponame may be used for other reasons later
Protected Repos
Do the Repos need to be locked?
Linking them into the manual just adds a block of code. They need a heading. William_Syd 21:03, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
RE: Protected Repos
I have added a short description to the repository configuration information, perhaps I will extend it a little more. But I don't think that we should unprotect the repository configuration information:
1. Not everybody needs to change this information, it is pretty critical information and everyone having a go at it could result in non-responsive systems or other strange errors we don't want the user community to suffer of.
2. The use of the pages with configuration information is templated by means of the Template:Repository so we do not need to look through all of the wiki pages and all configuration changes are changed at once, as well as a little (standard) information that is displayed when inserting the repository configuration anywhere in the Wiki. - Cactus 12:34, 10 July 2007 (EDT)
