Difference between revisions of "Bugzilla Help"

From SME Server
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
Line 5: Line 5:
 
Find, report and fix bugs here http://bugs.contribs.org
 
Find, report and fix bugs here http://bugs.contribs.org
  
===Bugzilla is too hard===
+
===Bugzilla is easy===
  
This is a frequent complaint, but it is hard to justify.
+
A frequent complaint is Bugzilla is too hard or convoluted, but it is hard to justify.
  
 
*You open an account
 
*You open an account

Revision as of 09:02, 12 February 2009


Bug Tracker

Please help us to make our software as reliable as possible. Please report possible bugs only via the bug tracker and to encourage others to do the same.

Find, report and fix bugs here http://bugs.contribs.org

Bugzilla is easy

A frequent complaint is Bugzilla is too hard or convoluted, but it is hard to justify.

  • You open an account
  • Then report your problem

SME is run by volunteers so we expect you to help by searching for existing bugs and by filing your bug in the format described below. To begin you need only read 'searching' and 'reporting'.

Searching Bugs

Have you searched bugzilla, and read the SME Server Manual and FAQ ?

To help find bugs, some prepared searches have been added to bugzilla page headers.

  • Simple

Select a Status and a Product category and enter your search term

  • Advanced

You can restrict searches by using a selection or multiple selections of a category
Use Control Click to select/deselect from selection sets, if none are selected all are.

  • Reports

A wiki page with more prepared searches.

  • Matrix

A Grid with one view of current bugs, more are available in Reports.

  • Recent

Bugs with activity in the last two days

Reporting Bugs

Please take the time to read How to report bugs effectively (available in multiple languages)

For bugs in SME Server Release, SME Server Future & SME Server Translations the following format is suggested. It's not always appropriate eg. New Feature Requests

Summary: How would you describe the bug. A good summary should quickly and uniquely identify a bug report. It should explain the problem, not your suggested solution.

  • Good: "Canceling a File Copy dialog crashes File Manager"
  • Bad: "Software crashes"
  • Bad: "Browser should work with my web site"

Description: The details of your problem report, including:

= Environment:

eg. SME Server 7.1, Updated to 7.3 with yum 

= Modifications: 

If the following produce any output, attach the results (don't post inline)
/sbin/e-smith/audittools/templates
/sbin/e-smith/audittools/newrpms

 or say, no custom-templates or contribs.

= Original problem:

Overview: 

Steps to Reproduce: 

Actual Results: 

Expected Results:

Verifying Bugs

Bugs in the SME Server Release, SME Server Future & SME Server Translations products need to be verified if fixed. (otherwise they can be closed) An example is bugzilla:3727. You can use the text below as a template.

Information from here is used in the Updates Announcements and if you use this format will save duplication of work

Other Products can be Closed after being fixed, as they are not part of the updates process.

= Environment:

= Current version installed:

= Original problem:

= Resolution:

= Updated version installed:

= Problem fixed:

= Verified or Reopen:

Marking VERIFIED.

General

Bug Categories

Bugs are sorted by Product, they should be mostly self explanatory. Future/7.x/8.x may need clarifying.

With the release of SME 7.3, development is now focussed on reaching 8.0

  • SME Server Future

- Bugs can be moved to future if they can be classified as NewFeatureRequest

- or as cleanup functionality that does not have a major (user-visible) impact.

- Bugs that should be fixed, but not sure which future release they will be fixed in

  • SME Server Release 7.X

- The error is severe enough that we need to fix it, taking time away from 8.x development

- The bug is being worked on actively

- The bug has been cloned from 8.x for backporting

  • SME Server Release 8.X

- current development

Bug Triage

If you can help do these steps, the developers can concentrate on fixing the bugs.
The steps in this list is maybe 90% of the time of most bugs.

Reread How to report bugs effectively

Now look at the bug reports in Bugzilla with your developer hat on.

  • Go into triage mode
  • Ask the questions asked by the essay
  • Get the information from the reporter
  • Reproduce the issue
  • Confirm the bug or mark it invalid if you can't reproduce it
  • Summarise the issue if the report isn't clear
  • Add a note about a workaround/fix if one is obvious to you
  • That fix may not be the one we adopt, but it often helps if you tell us what you did to fix it

Bug Status

Lifecycle of a Bug

Resolution status:

  • UNCONFIRMED

New bugs submitted by ordinary users are created in this state. Note. Project Developers tend not to look at unconfirmed bugs as they only have so much time, so it's important regular users check each others bugs.

  • NEW

Once bugs are confirmed, by anyone see note above, change the status to new,


  • FIXED

Set to fixed after the problem has been solved for others, eg a new rpm is available, documentation has been added, etc.

For SmeServer category bugs changing to FIXED is reserved for devs.

Occasionally the dev will forget to set the FIXED status and as part of the verification process will be pushed to FIXED on the way to VERIFIED by the person verifying the package. It should never be set to FIXED or VERIFIED without having a released package that is in CVS.

Bugs in Documentation, Translation, Contribs, or Websites categories need community involvement, anyone can resolve these FIXED.


Alternatives to Fixed are :

  • INVALID

If you see that a problem is not a bug. eg User error Mark INVALID if the report is of documented (i.e. expected and correct) behaviour, or was encountered in some explicitly unsupported circumstance

  • WONTFIX

This bug is:
- Too hard to fix
- Too rare
- Not something we can fix
- Something we chose not to expend resources on fixing

This is a hard call, usually made by the dev team. It may be a serious issue for the reporter but we may simply say "Sorry, that's just not worth the effort involved"

  • LATER

Leave the bug for later, eg in case another bug will fix a related issue.

  • REMIND

Needs follow-up from the reporter or someone else to get any further. Please REOPEN bugs when the follow-up comes in.

  • WORKSFORME

You've been able to show that the problem does not happen for you. You should do this on a known good test box without any contribs installed. Many of our reports are breakage due to contribs.

  • DUPLICATE

For when the reporter didn't find the related bug.


  • VERIFIED

Check the fix provided solves the issue.

  • CLOSED

Bug Tracker Administrators Close bugs in SME Current or SME Future,
but the reporter or maintainer can close in other sections, eg Documentation, Websites, Contribs
There is no need to verify a non-fix. Invalid/wontfix bugs can move straight to closed.

Bugzilla flags

These will be obvious to the people they are intended to serve. If you feel comfortable setting them based on information contained in the bug or needs you have for the bug then set them. If not then leave them be.

  • need_help_to_verify [-+?]

"I don't understand how to verify this bug - please help" - a request to the dev team or other verifiers to have another look at the bug. Please say what you don't understand and what you've looked at.

  • package_maintained_upstream

The package is maintained in an upstream repository. We won't be patching it locally. We've deemed it to be not important enough for us to fork the package, and so we'll wait for the fix to propogate from upstream. In these case we like to add a URL to the upstream bug report.

  • patch_or_code_attached [-+?]

There is either a patch or some code attached to this bug. Attached may actually mean inline in the text, but the bug contains some code change which someone says works for them.

  • Review [-+?]

This bug/change needs review by someone else. This is used by the dev team for "Do you think this change is a good one?"

  • [-+?]

Set the flag to ? to say someone needs to look at it