User talk:Electroman00

Signing

Please do not sign collaborative efforts as your own ([1]). Thanks — Cactus (talk | contribs)  16:07, 11 December 2008 (UTC)

Electroman00, please refrain from signing HowTo pages (I have once again reverted them and will not keep doing so), they are collaboratively edited and do not need a signature. Thanks. — Cactus (talk | contribs)  08:42, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Guess you missed all the other hundreds of signed pages in the wiki that are collaboratively edited.

So whats the rule here so everyone is on the same code page since there is no written rule, at least none that I was able to find.

There is a unwritten rule in the fact that this is a wiki and therefore, per definition, it is a collaborative effort and no ownership can nor should be claimed.

There is no need to sign pages as the history nicely shows you who has done what.

Please show me the hundred pages you mentioned, I doubt they are that many, so signatures can be removed there as well if inappropriate as some pages contain signatures as they are signing there user experience.

I am not aware of people claiming ownership or modifications.

I also would appreciate that you discuss stuff first if remarks are made, before changing things once again. — Cactus (talk | contribs)  08:56, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

I also would appreciate that you discuss stuff first if remarks are made, before changing things once again. Same here.

Some things do not need to be discussed as they are in the nature of a wiki. — Cactus (talk | contribs)  09:10, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

I also would appreciate if you would refrain from editing pages while they are being worked on at the very moment. At least wait until all editing is done, surely there are other pages you could work on in the mean time. Thanks much.

By the nature of the wiki it is hard to judge when work is done and is a collaborative effort — Cactus (talk | contribs)  09:10, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

Thus the reason to wait, at least more then a few minutes. 10-4

BTW did you see talk page about the bad links that were found?

Yes I did, still need to check them.

Next time please post the issues on the discussion tab of the affected page instead of on my personal talk page. Sorry no problem, will do.

So just to be clear, any time I see a page with a sig remove it?

No, any time you see an inappropriate sig nature you may remove it, but I prefer that you do so after making a remark on the discussion tab, since, and I do not mean to brag, you do not have the level of authority that I have in this wiki. — Cactus (talk | contribs)  09:10, 20 December 2008 (UTC)

10-4

Question for ya, see this page B2evolution under maintainer there's an email link, is that ok? Also the reason why I re added the sig was because I thought it was just the way I did it the first time that didn't sit well, the second time was the way I found it on another page, I'm looking for that page to show you also. I do agree with you though, the sig really isn't needed due to the history page.

Also is the some standard template somewhere i.e. a Howto template?

Sig pages

Here I'll let you change them, then I won't be the bad guy!! haha no smiley here 10-4. Zarafa B2evolution

Zarafa is a contrib and therefore it has a maintainer. That is the reason that the contrib template has a Minatainer section. — Cactus (talk | contribs)  11:50, 20 December 2008 (UTC)