Difference between revisions of "Simple Package Modification"
From SME Server
Jump to navigationJump to searchm (My 2ct's on the new build architecture) |
(Emphasize the need for the common folder) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
Now off to learn cvs (as mezzanine was a very nice shell hiding my lack of cvs knowledge) - [[User:Cactus|Cactus]] 05:07, 25 December 2007 (MST) | Now off to learn cvs (as mezzanine was a very nice shell hiding my lack of cvs knowledge) - [[User:Cactus|Cactus]] 05:07, 25 December 2007 (MST) | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Emphasize the need for the common folder == | ||
+ | |||
+ | I think we need to clearly document that you at least need to check out the common folder for the build system to work, am I right? - [[User:Cactus|Cactus]] 06:51, 25 December 2007 (MST) |
Revision as of 14:51, 25 December 2007
In Modify a Package cvs commit
- q enter [is this right ?? messy]
can be replaced by cvs -m '<comment>' commit and you won't be prompted for the comment....
My 2ct's on the new build architecture
- Is it normal behavior for 'make clean' to not remove the noarch folder and RPMS in there as it does remove the SRPM?
- Is it normal for make to create a SRPM in the root of the branch (package-name/contribs7/) and the noarch RPM in a noarch folder? Shouldn't it be desired to build the SPRM in a seperate folder as well?
Now off to learn cvs (as mezzanine was a very nice shell hiding my lack of cvs knowledge) - Cactus 05:07, 25 December 2007 (MST)
Emphasize the need for the common folder
I think we need to clearly document that you at least need to check out the common folder for the build system to work, am I right? - Cactus 06:51, 25 December 2007 (MST)