Difference between revisions of "Simple Package Modification"

From SME Server
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (My 2ct's on the new build architecture)
(Emphasize the need for the common folder)
Line 13: Line 13:
  
 
Now off to learn cvs (as mezzanine was a very nice shell hiding my lack of cvs knowledge) - [[User:Cactus|Cactus]] 05:07, 25 December 2007 (MST)
 
Now off to learn cvs (as mezzanine was a very nice shell hiding my lack of cvs knowledge) - [[User:Cactus|Cactus]] 05:07, 25 December 2007 (MST)
 +
 +
== Emphasize the need for the common folder ==
 +
 +
I think we need to clearly document that you at least need to check out the common folder for the build system to work, am I right? - [[User:Cactus|Cactus]] 06:51, 25 December 2007 (MST)

Revision as of 14:51, 25 December 2007

In Modify a Package cvs commit

q enter [is this right ?? messy]

can be replaced by cvs -m '<comment>' commit and you won't be prompted for the comment....

My 2ct's on the new build architecture

  1. Is it normal behavior for 'make clean' to not remove the noarch folder and RPMS in there as it does remove the SRPM?
  2. Is it normal for make to create a SRPM in the root of the branch (package-name/contribs7/) and the noarch RPM in a noarch folder? Shouldn't it be desired to build the SPRM in a seperate folder as well?

Now off to learn cvs (as mezzanine was a very nice shell hiding my lack of cvs knowledge) - Cactus 05:07, 25 December 2007 (MST)

Emphasize the need for the common folder

I think we need to clearly document that you at least need to check out the common folder for the build system to work, am I right? - Cactus 06:51, 25 December 2007 (MST)