Difference between revisions of "Talk:Client Authentication:Ubuntu"
From SME Server
Jump to navigationJump to search (ldap) |
(Talk page cleared of recent comments) |
||
| (27 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[User:Snoble|Snoble]] 23:28, 15 March 2010 (UTC) | [[User:Snoble|Snoble]] 23:28, 15 March 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | it could be interesting but how? any hint? thank you | ||
| + | |||
| + | Stefano 23:56, 30 August 2010 | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Yes, it'd be interesting, but I think we need to apply a patch so that users have the posixAccount objectClass (needed to store the UidNumber). See this bug: http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6074 | ||
| + | I've posted a patch, and I'm waiting for someone to review it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:VIP-ire|Daniel B.]] 08:30, 31 August 2010 | ||
Latest revision as of 20:50, 12 June 2013
Have you considered using LDAP against sme8, may or may not be simpler, at least you wouldn't be using winbind.
Snoble 23:28, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
it could be interesting but how? any hint? thank you
Stefano 23:56, 30 August 2010
Yes, it'd be interesting, but I think we need to apply a patch so that users have the posixAccount objectClass (needed to store the UidNumber). See this bug: http://bugs.contribs.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6074
I've posted a patch, and I'm waiting for someone to review it.
Daniel B. 08:30, 31 August 2010
