Difference between revisions of "Talk:AllRepositries"
m |
|||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
do you notice how pages with 'linked' pages inherit the catagory | do you notice how pages with 'linked' pages inherit the catagory | ||
[[User:Snoble|Snoble]] 04:55, 7 April 2007 (EDT) | [[User:Snoble|Snoble]] 04:55, 7 April 2007 (EDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | Thanks for helping at such a fast pace, I was indeed not completely finished :-) | ||
+ | |||
+ | I second your point of all repository creating code on one page, but it is one more page to maintain as we need to add each repository once it is created in the category, at least I do not know of a way to display all articles in a category at one page with one command. The extra burden on maintaining the page is my main reason for the request for removal. For the moment I will keep it. Maybe some other people have constructive ideas about it as well. - [[User:Cactus|Cactus]] 05:14, 7 April 2007 (EDT) |
Latest revision as of 10:14, 7 April 2007
Snoble, you are to fast for me :-) - Cactus 04:33, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
Somehow my other remark seems to have gotten lost: I don't see the need for this page, I might be missing something but I created an overview here already: http://wiki.contribs.org/Category:Yum_Repository. Therefore I think we can remove this page. Do you agree? - Cactus 04:40, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
---
Sorry, i jumped in while you were still constructing. This page may become useful when we have a lot more repositories with all the code on one page rather than a lot of different ones keep or remove, please yourself
The idea of separating the pages is good
do you notice how pages with 'linked' pages inherit the catagory Snoble 04:55, 7 April 2007 (EDT)
Thanks for helping at such a fast pace, I was indeed not completely finished :-)
I second your point of all repository creating code on one page, but it is one more page to maintain as we need to add each repository once it is created in the category, at least I do not know of a way to display all articles in a category at one page with one command. The extra burden on maintaining the page is my main reason for the request for removal. For the moment I will keep it. Maybe some other people have constructive ideas about it as well. - Cactus 05:14, 7 April 2007 (EDT)