Difference between revisions of "User talk:Jester"
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Update: Just installed zarafa 6.40.0 RC2 on a new sme8 server, it works as expected. | Update: Just installed zarafa 6.40.0 RC2 on a new sme8 server, it works as expected. | ||
| + | |||
| + | ---- | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hi Eastend99,<br> | ||
| + | The next beta of sme WILL have PHP 5.2.x, see: [[bugzilla:5170]], so when it comes out there will be a problem. | ||
| + | |||
| + | > Better solution to leave the contrib 'working' but add a note to take care when using PHP 5.2.x?<br> | ||
| + | I think that's a matter of taste. If you feel it more appropriate like that, put it back and add the note. Just as long as people are informed one way or the other. | ||
Revision as of 15:26, 19 February 2010
Hi Jester, Zarafa has known errors for over a year with PHP 5.2.x. (see Google). My up-to-date sme8 server runs PHP 5.1.6 out of the box and works fine with zarafa 6.30.9. (latest -1). This means the contrib is not broken if you use standard SME and/or release candidates for zarafa.
Better solution to leave the contrib 'working' but add a note to take care when using PHP 5.2.x?
Update: Just installed zarafa 6.40.0 RC2 on a new sme8 server, it works as expected.
Hi Eastend99,
The next beta of sme WILL have PHP 5.2.x, see: bugzilla:5170, so when it comes out there will be a problem.
> Better solution to leave the contrib 'working' but add a note to take care when using PHP 5.2.x?
I think that's a matter of taste. If you feel it more appropriate like that, put it back and add the note. Just as long as people are informed one way or the other.
