Difference between revisions of "Talk:SME8.0 QA"
(check x) |
|||
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
~~byte aka Gavin | ~~byte aka Gavin | ||
+ | =comments= | ||
+ | When doing an upgrade we need to know how an upgrade is taking place i.e CD or YUM and we need to test both upgrade paths. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Also don't forget to open separate bugs as their maybe issues with the upgrade as noticed a few talking points in the bug tracker with the /root/upgrade.log | ||
=Proposed template= | =Proposed template= | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
=Testing= | =Testing= | ||
Line 21: | Line 19: | ||
− | =Installation= | + | =Installation x= |
− | ==Installation types== | + | ==Installation types x== |
− | =Upgrading= | + | =Upgrading x= |
− | ==Upgrade from older versions== | + | ==Upgrade from older versions x== |
to check: /var/log/messages | to check: /var/log/messages | ||
Line 46: | Line 44: | ||
==Configure Server x== | ==Configure Server x== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===DHCP server x=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Server-gateway x=== | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===Server-only x=== | ||
==Test internet x== | ==Test internet x== | ||
Line 60: | Line 64: | ||
− | =Server | + | =Server Manager x= |
==Collaboration x== | ==Collaboration x== | ||
Line 86: | Line 90: | ||
====Backup x==== | ====Backup x==== | ||
− | + | =====to desktop x===== | |
− | + | =====to tape x===== | |
− | + | =====to workstation x===== | |
− | + | =====to usb disk x===== | |
====Restore x==== | ====Restore x==== | ||
− | + | =====from desktop (console) x===== | |
− | + | =====from tape x===== | |
− | + | =====from workstation x===== | |
− | + | =====from usb disk x===== | |
===View log files x=== | ===View log files x=== |
Latest revision as of 21:48, 24 September 2009
comments
I feel we need more than a "Pass" as for example under the server roles the PDC test was past but with not much information about what other PDC tests were done for example does PDC pass if you create a domain admins group and try to join a XP client with a user in the domain admins group ?!
Its an excellent start as I've said but we must be sure we are giving as good QA as we can so therefore we must make sure each test is tested intensively and showing that its been tested intensively.
~~byte aka Gavin
comments
When doing an upgrade we need to know how an upgrade is taking place i.e CD or YUM and we need to test both upgrade paths.
Also don't forget to open separate bugs as their maybe issues with the upgrade as noticed a few talking points in the bug tracker with the /root/upgrade.log
Proposed template
Testing
Test guidelines
Installation x
Installation types x
Upgrading x
Upgrade from older versions x
to check: /var/log/messages
- from 7.4
- from 7.3
- from 7.2
- from 7.1
- older 7.0
Console x
Check Status x
Configure Server x
DHCP server x
Server-gateway x
Server-only x
Test internet x
Reboot x
Raid x
Access Server Manger x
View Support x
Backup to USB x
Server Manager x
Collaboration x
Users x
Groups x
Quotas x
Pseudonyms x
Information Bays x
User access via file sharing x
Public access via web x
dynamic content
Administration x
Backup and restore x
Backup x
to desktop x
to tape x
to workstation x
to usb disk x
Restore x
from desktop (console) x
from tape x
from workstation x
from usb disk x
View log files x
Mail lof files x
Reboot and shutdown x
Security x
Remote access x
VPN / PPTP x
Remote management x
SSH x
FTP x
Local Networks x
Port forwarding x
Proxy settings x
Mail x
Web x
Configuration x
Software Installer x
Updates x
Settings x
Date and time x
Workgroup x
Domain controller x
Roaming profiles x
Directory x
Printers x
Hostnames x
Domains x
Email x
Access x
Filtering x
Reception x
Delivery x
Antivirus x
Review x
Miscellaneous x
Support x
Starter Website x
Other x
Languages x
Displays ok, translations up-to-date