Difference between revisions of "Talk:Heyu"
From SME Server
Jump to navigationJump to search (indented the comment) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
at the bottom of the page. Is this based on your single experience or is that a reason for removing the needs review template? --[[User:Ente|Ente]] 17:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC) | at the bottom of the page. Is this based on your single experience or is that a reason for removing the needs review template? --[[User:Ente|Ente]] 17:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
| − | It is based on my own set up, I usually add this section to have people indicate actual success data points. I did this in the Myth set up as well. | + | :It is based on my own set up, I usually add this section to have people indicate actual success data points. I did this in the Myth set up as well. |
| − | It does work fine and reliably. In general if I come across issues in future, I update the wiki. | + | :It does work fine and reliably. In general if I come across issues in future, I update the wiki. |
| − | I take your point about gcc, but it is also used in other How-to's such as "vmware". I'm open to suggestions on this front. | + | :I take your point about gcc, but it is also used in other How-to's such as "vmware". I'm open to suggestions on this front. |
| − | I would have thought that the "needs review" template would require someone to review the content for potential technical issues or bad practice; which is a good thing to do. | + | :I would have thought that the "needs review" template would require someone to review the content for potential technical issues or bad practice; which is a good thing to do. |
| − | BTW, how do you automatically add the signature/date tage such as you did on your comment? | + | :BTW, how do you automatically add the signature/date tage such as you did on your comment? |
Revision as of 18:25, 13 October 2008
Review Process
Coming from this thread let's talk here.
You (christian) have this:
User experience
- Tested with SME Server 7.3 and X10's CM11a - Works
at the bottom of the page. Is this based on your single experience or is that a reason for removing the needs review template? --Ente 17:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
- It is based on my own set up, I usually add this section to have people indicate actual success data points. I did this in the Myth set up as well.
- It does work fine and reliably. In general if I come across issues in future, I update the wiki.
- I take your point about gcc, but it is also used in other How-to's such as "vmware". I'm open to suggestions on this front.
- I would have thought that the "needs review" template would require someone to review the content for potential technical issues or bad practice; which is a good thing to do.
- BTW, how do you automatically add the signature/date tage such as you did on your comment?
