Difference between revisions of "Talk:Heyu"
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
I take your point about gcc, but it is also used in other How-to's such as "vmware". I'm open to suggestions on this front. | I take your point about gcc, but it is also used in other How-to's such as "vmware". I'm open to suggestions on this front. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I would have thought that the "needs review" template would require someone to review the content for potential technical issues or bad practice; which is a good thing to do. | ||
BTW, how do you automatically add the signature/date tage such as you did on your comment? | BTW, how do you automatically add the signature/date tage such as you did on your comment? | ||
Revision as of 18:22, 13 October 2008
Review Process
Coming from this thread let's talk here.
You (christian) have this:
User experience
- Tested with SME Server 7.3 and X10's CM11a - Works
at the bottom of the page. Is this based on your single experience or is that a reason for removing the needs review template? --Ente 17:03, 13 October 2008 (UTC)
It is based on my own set up, I usually add this section to have people indicate actual success data points. I did this in the Myth set up as well.
It does work fine and reliably. In general if I come across issues in future, I update the wiki.
I take your point about gcc, but it is also used in other How-to's such as "vmware". I'm open to suggestions on this front.
I would have thought that the "needs review" template would require someone to review the content for potential technical issues or bad practice; which is a good thing to do.
BTW, how do you automatically add the signature/date tage such as you did on your comment?
