Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Yum Repository"
m (Added indentation for reply) |
m |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
== Protected Repos == | == Protected Repos == | ||
Revision as of 07:22, 12 July 2007
Protected Repos
Do the Repos need to be locked?
Linking them into the manual just adds a block of code. They need a heading. William_Syd 21:03, 9 July 2007 (EDT)
RE: Protected Repos
I have added a short description to the repository configuration information, perhaps I will extend it a little more. But I don't think that we should unprotect the repository configuration information:
1. Not everybody needs to change this information, it is pretty critical information and everyone having a go at it could result in non-responsive systems or other strange errors we don't want the user community to suffer of.
2. The use of the pages with configuration information is templated by means of the Template:Repository so we do not need to look through all of the wiki pages and all configuration changes are changed at once, as well as a little (standard) information that is displayed when inserting the repository configuration anywhere in the Wiki. - Cactus 12:34, 10 July 2007 (EDT)[/indent]-|}
